It’s reported in the press that a health care
worker, recently diagnosed with Ebola, is being offered plasma treatment in a London hospital. This
involves a transfusion of plasma from patients who have recovered from Ebola.
Plasma (blood with the cells removed) is a rich
broth, full of antibodies and other immune proteins. The treatment should
perhaps be re-named “antibody transfusion”.
When there's a new, unfamiliar infection the
adaptive division of the immune system takes a while to set up a production
line for the appropriate antibodies. First, a wandering immune cell detects the
presence of a virus or bacterium and carries it to a
lymph node where it's examined by passing lymphocytes. If a lymphocyte identifies it as a new threat it settles down in
the lymph node, cloning a huge number of identical self-copies. These are then
released (into the plasma) with the capacity to flood the body with millions of
copies of the newly minted antibody. It is this lymphocyte-cloning process that
takes several days.
The danger is, that in a disease like Ebola, a
patient could die before their own antibodies can be produced in sufficient
quantities to eliminate the virus. An infusion of antibodies from a recovered
patient has the potential to keep them alive until their own production gets up
to speed.
From the late 1890s plasma has been used to
treat infections. Often the donor was a horse, which had been inoculated with a
virus or bacterium causing it to form ample quantities of the antibody. The
technique saved many lives but had its disadvantages – the need to keep large
stables of horses and the risk of developing immune reactions to equine plasma
proteins to name but two. The practice declined rapidly with the discovery of
antibiotics and other modern drugs.
Plasma donated by human Ebola survivors has proved
useful in previous outbreaks and is probably the best treatment currently
available. As with any type of blood transfusion donors should be screened for
viruses such as HIV. WHO has recently issued guidelines.
I’m sure we all hope that in this current UK case
it will prove successful.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/135591/1/WHO_HIS_SDS_2014.8_eng.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment